|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Legislative Activities Amicus Brief Call for a National Commission Capitol Reports Chiefs Counsel Column Contact Congress Issues Legal Officers Section Legislative Agenda for Congress Legislative Alerts Legislative Updates Model Statutes Project Testimony and Communication Viewpoints This letter outlining IACP's view of the Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act of 2000 was sent to Attorney General Janet Reno.March 22, 2000 The Honorable Janet Reno
Dear Ms. Reno: On behalf of the International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP), I am writing to provide our views on the H.R. 1658, the Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act of 2000. As you know the IACP is world's oldest and largest association of law enforcement executives with more than 17,000 members in 101 countries. At the outset, I would like to note that the IACP is gratified to see that many of our concerns with H.R. 1658 have been addressed. Most notably, the agreement to place the burden of proof on the government by a preponderance of evidence standard, as well as those provisions which continue the viability of the equitable sharing programs and those addressing the federal adoption of state and local forfeitures, are strongly supported by the IACP. In addition, the IACP is pleased to see that attorney fees awards will be paid from the Equal Access to Justice Fund and not drawn from the forfeiture fund. However, the IACP remains concerned over the elimination of the cost bond requirement. Throughout this debate, it has been the IACP's contention that the elimination of the cost bond requirement has the potential for damaging the effectiveness of the asset forfeiture program. The IACP is not convinced that the up-front certification requirement and post-hearing penalty provisions contained in this legislation will serve as a sufficient deterrent to prevent the filing of an excessive number of frivolous claims. If such a provision is enacted then we hope that the Justice Department will take all steps necessary to prevent our concerns from becoming reality. Ensuring that law enforcement agencies continue to have the ability to effectively seize and forfeit the assets of criminals' remains of vital importance to the IACP. Sincerely, Colonel Michael D. Robinson
Links |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||